|
Conservation
of India's Protected Areas
Air Cmde. 'Pat' Singh |
|||
Home Contributed Articles Focus On Maps PhotoGallery Equipment info Buy/Sell/Rent Stuff Site Map Contact Us
|
The net result is that although the viewing of wildlife has improved, the behaviour patterns of wild animals and the natural propagation of the bio-diversity of such areas have been adversely effected. The argument for tourism is that it brings economic benefits, hinders poaching and other illegal activities and "opens up" remote areas. However, if the implementation of the law is weak, then the development of such areas for tourism ends up by assisting those who illegally exploit such areas. Unfortunately, the implementation of law in the rural and remote areas of India is weak. There is a need to protect PAs effectively. The rapid increase in India's population dictates that we not only protect our PAs but also expand our natural forest cover, rather than clear them for farmland. This is specially relevant in ecologically sensitive areas such as the Sivalik and Himalayan hill regions. Forest cover is the best investment against floods, enhancement of rain and supply / storage of fresh water. If there is a single most important element for human survival, then it is fresh water. It is therefore essential that we conserve and protect our forests and wildlife as they exist today and refrain from any sort of human activity, including tourism, that adversely effects them. As it stands today, our politicians view the development of forest areas only in terms of short term gains through exploitation rather than long term benefits. The lack of political will is amply illustrated by our inability to effectively protect the tiger and the rhino, the former of which is even associated with Hindu divinity. A lot has been said for and against human habitation in and around our PAs. In this respect our forest policies have been defective for the past couple of hundred years since the key word ha been 'exploitation' and has all but excluded the participation of local communities in the management of forest areas. This has given rise to a negative attitude towards what is perceived to be government property run by inefficient and corrupt officials. Lately however, there has been talk of revising this age-old policy and one can only hope that it will be the first in many positive steps to be taken in the right direction. |